<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HD i&#8217;s and P&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rmaspero.com/2007/10/24/hd-is-and-ps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rmaspero.com/2007/10/24/hd-is-and-ps/</link>
	<description>it's all about me and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:56:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmaspero</title>
		<link>http://rmaspero.com/2007/10/24/hd-is-and-ps/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>rmaspero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmaspero.com/2007/10/24/hd-is-and-ps/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I have no idea why here is a diffrence in laptops and TV&#039;s. If you compare 720 with 480 you can see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea why here is a diffrence in laptops and TV&#8217;s. If you compare 720 with 480 you can see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Leigh</title>
		<link>http://rmaspero.com/2007/10/24/hd-is-and-ps/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmaspero.com/2007/10/24/hd-is-and-ps/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I find this sort of thing very &quot;nessercary&quot; for me, so interesting.  And also I need it all repeating frequently &#039;cos I forget.  It&#039;s interesting that 760 does not seem to be all that much more than regular tv despite the high cost of sets - and also the large difference that 1080 is.  My only question is - why is the computer resolution 1920x1200 rather than 1920x1080?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this sort of thing very &#8220;nessercary&#8221; for me, so interesting.  And also I need it all repeating frequently &#8216;cos I forget.  It&#8217;s interesting that 760 does not seem to be all that much more than regular tv despite the high cost of sets &#8211; and also the large difference that 1080 is.  My only question is &#8211; why is the computer resolution 1920&#215;1200 rather than 1920&#215;1080?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://rmaspero.com/2007/10/24/hd-is-and-ps/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmaspero.com/2007/10/24/hd-is-and-ps/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I did something similar on my blog (in fact the very same article) and I didn&#039;t find that it really got traction so I let it go - but I might start doing it again if I feel that it could be nessercary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did something similar on my blog (in fact the very same article) and I didn&#8217;t find that it really got traction so I let it go &#8211; but I might start doing it again if I feel that it could be nessercary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

